Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MecSoft Corporation (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- MecSoft Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actually deleted in 2011 where I also suggest deleting, and since chances are it's not symmetrical to then, we're at AfD again; searches are not finding anything actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Concur with original deletion and current nomination. Non-notable software company, fails WP:CORP. No secondary coverage found, just some listings and press releases. MB 22:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Searches are only turning up press releases, or trivial mentions. Nothing which rises to the level required by either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 TT me 21:13, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I just couldn't find any proof of notability in reliable sources. There are voluminous pickups of the company's press releases in the trade press, so raw searching is a bit like searching for one good part in a pile of bad ones. The company's 'press' section on their website has nothing but press releases either. Found one instance where the company re-published the content of an interview that was done with their CEO, but that's not much use either. BoyRD (talk) 23:58, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.