Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Keam (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Abigail Keam

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Abigail Keam
• Articles for deletion/Abigail Keam (2nd nomination)

Abigail Keam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not an obviously notable author. This was tagged WP:CSD#G4 but I stopped short of deleting it because this version, unlike the one that was deleted, has some sources. However, the references are all self-published or run of the mill book reviews (where the author is just one of many in a stock round-up), and a search for other sources draws a complete blank. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

• Delete no significant indepdent coverage of her work as a writer in reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
• Delete prolific author with two vanity book awards, and no significant independent coverage that I can find. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 22:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.